yesgabsstuff
replied to your post
“My Big Gay Berserk Analysis 3”
@bthump I do think that there is so much to look at via the “predatory gays trope” and the way it’s handled in the text especially in regard to Casca. The text seems on the one hand to be dealing very forthrightly with toxic masculinity and homophobia and it having destructive consequences while at the same time sort of reinforcing the idea that “not normal” desires or even just difficulties that are as the result of trauma do ultimately lead you satisfy those desires with violence in a way? Idk
Yeah I definitely didn’t get as into it as I could’ve.
In my final gay berserk post I do get into the depiction of trauma in Berserk a bit and how it affects the characters/plot so I discuss this kind of thing a little there. So stay tuned for that, it might be of some interest.
Idk if I’d call Berserk “forthright” when it comes to homophobia, since any potential depiction of it (say internalized homophobia and repression on Guts or Griffith’s parts) is left in subtext. It’s more forthright on misogyny, but even then the textual depiction of it tends to be 2 dimensional hot takes like rape threats and “boy it sure sucks to be a woman in a society that sees them as lesser, also periods.”
lol I’ve been kind of kicking this response around for a while and not really coming up with anything useful to say. idk like Berserk + misogyny/homophobia/etc is the most difficult subject of all. If you ever wrote an analysis of it I’d be v into reading it though.
I think ultimately my take boils down to feeling like the bad by far outweighs the good, even if some of what Miura did is purposeful commentary. So like say, the way Guts and Griff are both victims of sexual predators (who use their societal position to facilitate their predatory behaviour, ie Gennon using his wealth and power to collect a harem and Donovan telling Guts it happens all the time in mercenary camps), and the way both of their ~dark sides~ manifest in sexual assault while evidencing homoerotic desire they couldn’t act on. Maybe it’s a deliberate point that societal violence begets violence and internalized homophobia fucks you up. But even if that’s what Miura’s trying to say (and I do think it’s def a stretch) it’s still so offensively depicted (eroticization of assault, Casca’s fridging, no positive gay characters to compensate for all the predatory homoeroticism, etc) that it doesn’t really make it much better to me.
But then at the same time author intention doesn’t necessarily matter when it comes to what the reader gets out of a text. Like, in that 4th part of my gay meta I mentioned I basically throw author intention out the window and say ‘here’s what I get from it and why i prefer this take to whatever miura may have intended.’
so idk basically i think various opinions on this subject are worthwile regardless of the author and how he fucks up bc his own offensive biases etc get in the way, and if you have more thoughts on his at any point I’m interested!