@removing-the-part-that-continues said: I know
Miura has a bad history on the subject, but would even Miura have had Guts
sexually assault her if he meant for them to get back together?
I want to believe. I mean mostly I do believe – Skull Knight’s ominous warning plus Guts’ “even if you force back what was lost it still won’t be the way it was” are a pretty serious one-two punch of foreboding. But idk considering the antagonist’s first act was to rape a beloved character and Miura still writes him as morally ambiguous and not a true villain and has in fact directly said he thinks of him as such, I feel like if the romance doesn’t happen it’ll be because Miura is just not into happy romance lol, and goes a different direction, rather than it being a direct consequence of Guts’ actions.
On the other hand Casca is still scared of him so it’s not like Miura dropped it as a factor, so maybe I’m being too cynical. It’s hard to say when you’re dealing with an author who sometimes writes rape fairly sensitively and with a focus on the victim and how it affects them, and sometimes just goes all-out for nothing but pure shock factor