Sorry this took a while, I was way overthinking it at first lol and then I was busy yesterday.
But like, I’m figuring you’re basically referring to like, Griffith’s narrative raising the “Is it worth sacrificing your friends/filling the world with monsters to create a just society” question vs Guts’ narrative, especially circa the conviction arc, being more like, fuck whether other people are able to live in peace, everyone should be strong enough to survive an unjust world and if they’re not that’s their problem.
And I mean if we’re just talking moral philosophies behind those narratives then yeah I’m with Griffith, often it is worth doing some bad things for a greater good, sometimes the end does justify the means, and I’d rather work to create a society where the strong don’t prey on the weak than just try to make myself strong enough to avoid being preyed on.
In the example given specifically idk that I’d agree with filling the world w/ fantasy nightmares to make a chunk of it utopian lmao, but yk, Berserk likes to go to extremes.
you're the only one 